One of the important factors affecting compressor performance is the distribution of work between compressor stages.
There can be many different axial compressors with the same design point value for efficiency, airflow and pressure ratio and all of these compressors will meet the required parameters at the design point. Compressors operate in a variety of modes. Many compressors are equipped with a turning inlet guide vane (IGV) or guide vane (GV). At the same time, the question of the number of stages with a turning IGV or GV, at what angle to turn them, and whether the maximum efficiency will be the same remains unresolved. To answer this, designers need to compare the impact of the distribution of work between compressor stages at the design point on the compressor characteristic. This allows you to choose the form of work distribution to achieve the specified parameters of the compressor in off-design modes of operation. This also allows you to obtain the required degree of pressure ratio and airflow at a given frequency of rotation of the compressor rotor. This analysis is necessary for jet engines since the compressor works in conjunction with the combustion chamber, turbine, and nozzle. This can also be carried out for other applications of multistage compressors.
With the help of AxSTREAM and ION, studies were carried out on multistage compressors with various shapes of the flow path, a different number of stages, and a different distribution of work among the stages.
The problem is considered in the following formulation:
- Distribution of work on compressor stages.
- Compressor operating mode.
Axial compressor type:
- With fixed IGV or GV.
- With turn of IGV or GV.
Additional task for the compressor with turn IGV or GV:
- Develop a criterion for the required number of compressor stages with restagger angle of the blades IGV or GV.
The compressor is taken from the article sourced at the end of this post Read More